Search for: "John Jeffrey Oliver"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Jeffrey Rosen, Brandeis’s Seat, Kagan’s Responsibility, New York Times (July 3, 2010). [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:56 am
Everyone's a-twitter about Jeffrey Toobin's profile of Chief Justice John Roberts in this week's New Yorker. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 8:03 pm
The pairs he examines are: 1) John Marshall (M/P) and Thomas Jefferson (IPW) 2) John Marshall Harlan (M/P) and Oliver Wendell Holmes (IPW) 3) Hugo Black (M/P) and Melvin William Douglas (IPW) 4) William Rehnquist (M/P) and Antonin Scalia (IPW) Of these, the only ideologically pure warrior to have influenced constitutional law in the long run, according to Rosen, is Holmes, and only because he moderated his judicial philosophy in the 1920s. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
The tale continues after the Civil War with Justices John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes, who clashed over the limits of majority rule. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:00 am
The tale continues after the Civil War with Justices John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes, who clashed over the limits of majority rule. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
On C-SPAN, Jeffrey Rosen, National Constitution Center, discusses Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s The Common Law (1881), which the Library of Congress identified as one of the Books That Shaped America. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:08 am
” In response, she named John Marshall, the first John Marshall Harlan, Louis Brandeis, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:48 am
The bad guys are brilliant loners like Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., William O. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:22 am
” TR was as mistaken about Holmes’s spine as are various progressives today about Chief Justice John Roberts’s. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 9:15 am
See also related "Last Week Tonight with John Oliver" video on immigration courts. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:39 am
" Last Week Tonight's John Oliver convinced a judge to dismiss a defamation suit filed by Robert Murray of Murray Energy, finding that the comedian was well with his First Amendment rights to criticize the coal baron and his company on HBO. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:06 am
(The reporter, Jeffrey Toobin of New Yorker Magazine, has this lengthy article on Stevens’ career in the March 22 edition.) [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
She expressed her belief that the FTC has done a good job in the consumer protection area, especially lately.In introductory remarks, Committee Chairman John D. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:01 pm
Today's roundup is a bit heavy on the technology and privacy side with good posts from Jeffrey Freedman, Winston Maxwell and Richard Granat. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 10:17 am
It focuses on the clashes between eight large personalities whose personal and philosophical battles continue to influence the Court today: John Marshall and Thomas Jefferson; John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes; Hugo Black and William O. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
Jeffrey S. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 6:21 pm
345 Oliver R. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:25 pm
Why, with none other than the next President of the United States -- John Edwards, of course.While the one-hour "one-on-one interivew" was "off the record," John was at his best, cogently addressing many of his campaign's core issues and platforms (including ending the war in Iraq, implementing universal health care coverage, alleviating poverty and addressing global warming).Although… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm
A number of exemplary sex scandals stand out: Ryan Giggs and the sister-in-law, John Terry and the girl next door, David Beckham and the Senorita, Jude Law and the Nanny, Wayne Rooney and the Granny, Jeffrey Archer and the prostitute, Max Mosley and the prostitutes, David Mellor and the Chelsea top, Brooks Newmark and the paisley bottom, Ron Davis and the badger. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:07 am
One former clerk of Justice John Paul Stevens estimated that clerks generate “well over half” of the text in published opinions. [read post]
